Sunday, December 21, 2025

CIPI Paper on how to increase travel from the US to Cuba

 

Reinvigorating U.S. people to people travel to Cuba, adopting Viet Nam’s market model.

By John McAuliff, Fund for Reconciliation and Development

Edited and expanded from oral presentation at Programa de la XXIII Serie de conversaciones Cuba en la política exterior de EE.UU.: El Regreso de Trump: Impacto presente y futuro para Cuba.  Centro de Investigaciones de Politica Internacional (CIPI)  December 18, 2025

 

(Thanks to Amb Cabanas who contributed to and enjoyed the most positive moments of bilateral relations in decades, before or since.)

 

Everyone is aware of the very difficult situation for tourism in Cuba.[1]   The number of foreign visitors declined from 4.7 million in the peak year of 2018 to 2.2 million in 2024.  2025 is expected to be worse.  While competitors in the Caribbean recovered from the covid shock, Cuba’s market has not.

A significant cause is harsher application of the US embargo.  While there are still legal categories permitting American travelers, large scale commercial movement is impossible as long as cruises and use of State owned hotels is banned.  That was a maximum pressure policy initiated by the first Trump administration and not corrected by Biden.

The absurd listing of Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism discourages visitors from Europe who lose their ESTA visa waiver to enter the US for ten years if they travel to Cuba. 

The objective conditions in Cuba of power failures, limits on food and debilitating mosquito borne diseases have also had a depressing effect on conventional holiday tourism.   The harsh treatment of both moderate and extremist protestors in 2021 and conflicts between cultural dissidents and authorities also diminish enthusiasm for Cuba as a destination.  The same thing happened with China for two to three years after Tiananmen Square

Cuba is making efforts to reverse the trend.  A significant step is that foreign companies will be able to lease as well as manage hotels.   In theory, they will have more normal corporate authority to directly hire staff and to invest in improved facilities.  A conversation with a staff member of Sol Melia suggests the major chains will be cautious and see how the new system works on one or two test cases.

I am approaching this problem on both a macro and micro level.

 

A.      Macro

Based on my decades long experience with Viet Nam, it is worth considering what the impact would be on travel if Cuba took bold experimental steps towards a market economy in only this sector.  When I first began organizing trips for professors and other professionals in the mid 1980s, Viet Nam like Cuba treated travel as a state monopoly.  Vietnam Tourism organized all group tours and owned and controlled all the hotels, not even allowing management by foreign companies.  The first signs of change were private mini hotels on the fringes of Ha Noi.  The doi moi market reforms in 1986 led to legal and administrative changes that allowed foreigners, both Asian and western, as well as Vietnamese investors, to build and own hotels.  Large international companies created luxury branded properties.   Vietnamese investors competed in this market and dominated smaller scale two or three star offerings for backpackers, overseas nationals and other budget conscious travelers.

This graph created by Chat GP illustrates the dramatic change in revenue share between the state and private sector in less than twenty years.  Notable is that domestic private has a greater value share than foreign ownership in the initial and later stages

 

 

The number of foreign tourists coming to Viet Nam.  Data not available before 1995.

 

In current dollars, the value of international tourism, marked by circles, and percent of national GDP, marked by squares, until COVID

Vietnamese entrepreneurs created travel agencies, tour operators and specialized services supplemented by foreigners with niche businesses like SCUBA shops and tours.  The Vietnamese Union of Friendship Organizations, the counterpart of ICAP, still organizes tour programs that focus on friendship and many kinds of long term institutional cooperation.  US veterans of the American war and of the peace movement are an important although diminishing special audience.

The growth of international arrivals in Viet Nam demonstrates the roaring success of a free market methodology from 250,000 in 1990 to 19.1 million by November of this year.   (Note that Viet Nam has ten times the population of Cuba so the ratio of visitors is less.)

If Cuba chose to introduce a similar open market system for the travel sector, it could attract substantial foreign investment, management and training skills, and a growing number of tourists.  US companies excluded by the embargo would complain more strongly to our government about long term competitive disadvantage that will become more serious than when the only benefit for European companies is management contracts.  If Cuba sold rather that leased selected hotels to trusted European partners, under current US law and regulations they could become available for American tour groups and independent travelers.

 

B.       Micro

Turning to the micro level, there is a small step that has been officially rejected[2], but can be taken easily and quickly, the licensing of tour guides as cuenta propistas and of microenterprises in the travel sector. There is already a gray market of guides who operate privately, many of whom formerly worked for state companies.   In 2021 an informal association of guides made a written proposal to the Ministries of Tourism and Labor that was rejected.[3]  Symptomatically all but two members of the original organizing committee now live abroad, a loss of badly needed entrepreneurial talent and energy.

If cuenta propista guides and microenterprise travel companies were legally recognized, it could have a significant impact on US visitors organized by independent travel agencies and home based agents, about 15% of the US holiday travel industry.  Their small scale does not easily fit with Cuba’s state companies, but their cumulative impact for the country’s economy can be significant.  Legal status for their Cuban counterparts and a channel to transfer pre-payments are essential requirements for serious business.  The ability to develop mutually trusted business relationships that match the agendas and styles of senders and receivers is an inducement for additional visitors and repeat trips.  Direct company to company collaboration between Americans and Cubans will generate practical ways to overcome current objective hardships and will increase tax revenue.

Private tour guides became active in Viet Nam from the late 1980s.   In 2001 a legal licensing mechanism was adopted requiring educational qualifications and tourism training that currently registers 26,309 guides for international visitors.

 

C.       Changing bilateral parameters

Finally, I want to address the policy problem that constrains a large economic impact of US tourists.   Attention should be given to the unusual character of the Trump Administration.  The first half of Trump One witnessed little change in the Obama policies on travel.  It was only when John Bolton became National Security Adviser (April 2018 to September 2019) that his long animus to the Cuban revolution combined with the political agenda of Senator Marco Rubio and Mauricio Claver-Carone to devastate travel through maximum pressure.  Cruises were forbidden so abruptly on June 5, 2019 that ships had to be rerouted.  Trump now despises and distrusts Bolton and is seeking revenge with controversial criminal indictments.  It should also not be forgotten that before he became a candidate for President Trump sent an exploratory team to Cuba that had very positive conversations about golf courses and resorts.  

If anyone could exercise unilateral power to end the embargo, it is Donald Trump.  Robert Muse outlined the legal argument in 2020.[4]  Marco Rubio as an ambitious and opportunist Secretary of State who hopes to succeed Trump, could not oppose him.  An inducement to this transactional President, would be to allow the Trump Corporation to lease or purchase Cuba’s new mega hotel on La Rampa.   It would discomfit most of your American friends and many Cubans to see the name Trump on the top of the tallest building in Havana, but it could be only a temporary burden. 

I want to make another Viet Nam comparison.  Just  before we went to Viet Nam to celebrate the 50th anniversary of peace and reunification, Damien Cave, who also has a history covering Cuba, wrote a long article about a $1.5 billion dollar Trump golf resort to be built near Ha Noi.[5]  Many Vietnamese were upset because the project ignored normal approval procedures, including environment restrictions, and because it will replace valuable privately owned farmland.  But from the viewpoint of government leaders, good will from the all transactional Trump could help with upcoming high priority tariff negotiations.

An even greater and more controversial inducement could involve Venezuela.   President Trump does not want on his record thousands of civilian deaths and endless war entailed by regime change.  However he needs  a symbolic victory over President Maduro given how much he has committed US forces and prestige.   From a Venezuelan perspective, what is more important, the titular position of Maduro whose electoral victory is doubted by significant friends of Cuba or the preservation of peace and of a sovereign functioning government?  If Cuba used its historic ties with Venezuela’s government and military to help find a transitional diplomatic solution reflecting current realities, it would be reasonable for it to insist on as significant a change in US policy on Cuba, i.e. the end of the embargo.

 

Additional resources

"Travel:  Symbol of and Vehicle for Change"  by John McAuliff                                                   Edited Spanish version presented to Congreso de Pensamiento, Holguin, Cuba 10/23/19   (revised and updated from talk presented at XVI Edicion de la Serie de Conversaciones Cuba en la Politica Exterior de los Estados Unidos de America del 13 - 15 de diciembre de 2017 Centro de Investigaciones de Politica Internacional (CIPI)  Instituto Superior de Relaciones Internacionales  (ISRI)

“People to People Diplomacy:   A step, not a solution”  Presented at Ultimo Jueves panel sponsored by Revista Temas, Havana, July 18, 2019  https://cubapeopletopeople.blogspot.com/2019/09/people-to-people-diplomacy-diplomacia.html

Wikipedia Summary of Current Situation of Tourism in Viet Nam https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourism_in_Vietnam

“Tourism & Economic Development in Vietnam” by Bee Chin NG   School of Social Science Institution for Asian Studies The University of Birmingham, June 2008 https://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/1783/1/Ng08MPhil.pdf

“Tourism development in Vietnam: New strategy for a sustainable pathway” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344416150_Tourism_development_in_Vietnam_New_strategy_for_a_sustainable_pathway

“From Deadly Enemies to Comprehensive Strategic Partners: The Twenty Year Transformation of US Viet Nam Relations, Potential Implications for US-Cuba Relations”  by John McAuliff Programa del evento XXI Edición de la Serie de Conversaciones “Cuba en la Política Exterior de Estados Unidos de América”.  El Centro de Investigaciones de Política Internacional (CIPI) con el coauspicio del Instituto Superior de Relaciones Internacionales (ISRI) Hotel Nacional, Havana, December 17-19, 2024                                                      https://vnpeacecomm.blogspot.com/2024/12/the-path-to-us-viet-nam-normalization.html

“Reconciliation Between Peace and Normalization, 1975-1995”   Prepared for US Institute of Peace Dialogue on War Legacies and Peace, October 13, 2022  by John McAuliff    https://vnpeacecomm.blogspot.com/2022/10/mcauliff-paper-for-usip-on.html

 



[1] “Cuban tourism industry flounders as sunseekers look elsewhere”  By Marc Frank     February 18, 2022    https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/cuban-tourism-industry-flounders-sunseekers-look-elsewhere-2022-02-18/

[2] Cuba approves long-sought legal status for private businesses 

By Marc Frank  June 2, 2021

“Resolution 132/2021, published in the extraordinary Gaceta Oficial 46, indicates that national travel agencies are the only ones authorized to carry out procedures such as the issuance, reception and service of tourists, the representation of foreign tour operators, and the design and marketing of tourist packages.”

 

[4] “The president has the constitutional power to unilaterally terminate the embargo on Cuba”

Robert L. Muse  |  October 8, 2020                                        https://cubapeopletopeople.blogspot.com/2022/02/presidential-power-to-end-embargo.html

[5] "Why Vietnam Ignored Its Own Laws to Fast-Track a Trump Family Golf Complex," by Damien Cave, May 25, 2025

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/25/world/asia/trump-vietnam-golf-project.html?unlocked_article_code=1.-k8.McQG.TdUN0fE3dGva&smid=url-share

No comments:

Post a Comment