Department Press Briefing – January 4, 2023
QUESTION: Switching topics. Cuba. The embassy I
believe today resumed visa operations for immigrants. What does this say both –
does this have any implications more broadly for relations with Cuba? And also,
what does it say about Havana Syndrome – so-called Havana Syndrome that was the
original reason for reducing staff levels there? Is there a perception that
there’s no longer the same threat level, at least in Havana?
MR PRICE: A couple things on this. So as you
mentioned, starting today, the U.S. Embassy in Havana is processing all
immigrant visa categories in addition to current services provided in Cuba,
which include American citizen services as well as official diplomatic and
emergency non-immigrant visas. This is a significant step in the restoration of
consular services in Havana. It means all Cuban immigrant visa applicants
scheduled for interviews starting this month will no longer have to travel to
Georgetown, Guyana, where processing was taking place. Immigrant visa
applicants whose appointments were originally scheduled in Georgetown, Guyana
must still complete case processing in Guyana. Those cases will not be transferred
to Cuba, but going forward new cases will be processed from our embassy in
Havana.
The embassy began expanding consular services in May of 2022 by
expanding immigrant visas for parents of U.S. citizens, and in July of 2022
expanded to include all other categories of immediate relatives – relative
immigrant visas, including spouses and minor children of U.S. citizens as well.
Additionally, in August of last year DHS resumed processing cases in Havana
under the Cuban Family Reunification Program. The – we remain committed to
facilitating the safe, orderly, and regular migration of Cuban citizens to the
United States.
To the first part of your question, what this speaks to when it comes to
our broader approach to Cuba, I think it makes real what we have consistently
said that we seek to find practical ways to support the Cuban people. As I said
just a moment ago, this visa processing, much of it is directed in very
practical ways to support the Cuban people, including through family
reunification. That has been a focus of our visa processing since the start of
this administration. It will continue to be a focus now.
When it comes to anomalous health incidents, we have reviewed our
staffing posture at our embassy in Havana at the direction of the President,
and we’re exploring options to augment staffing to facilitate diplomatic,
consular, and civil society engagement with an appropriate security posture, as
we do around the world. Our top priority remains the health of – and safety of
U.S. citizens overseas, including of course our diplomats and their family
members, and we’re working to get to the bottom of anomalous health incidents
and to provide top-notch care and support to everyone affected.
The investigation into what has caused these incidents and how we can
protect our people is ongoing. And this represents a major effort that is
underway within the interagency – among the White House, the Defense
Department, Intelligence Community, as well as Congress and leading scientists,
all with the input of the State Department, of course.
So the fact that we have been able to augment our staffing posture at
our embassy in Havana is a signal that we are confident in our ability to
mitigate the risks, confident in our ability to take prudent steps to protect
our people. But this is something we evaluate and re-evaluate on a – virtually
a daily basis.
QUESTION: Just briefly, you say you’re
confident about the – the State Department is confident about the ability to
mitigate the risk, in the sense that it’s not – there’s not seen as a
particular risk in Havana from anomalous health incidents as opposed to other places?
MR PRICE: Well, diplomacy is never a risk-free
endeavor, and our goal— is never a risk-free endeavor.
QUESTION: What? Oh, “risk-free.” I thought you
said “risky endeavor.”
MR PRICE: Yes. Yes, it is never a risk-free
endeavor. And our intention is never to eliminate risk, because we know that’s
impossible. Our goal is to mitigate risk, and to conduct our operations
responsibly, safely, taking into account all of the prudent precautions that
are necessary in posts around the world. And that’s what we’re doing here.
QUESTION: But you’re – but just to be specific
as to this, you’re looking to add people, not reduce people, to Havana?
MR PRICE: Over the course of the last year, we
have —
QUESTION: No, I know, but now, from now —
MR PRICE: Yes, we have added people, and as we
restart this visa processing out of our embassy in Havana, our intention, our
hope will be to add people so we can expand those services that we’re able to
provide from Havana.
Department
Press Briefing – January 13, 2023
QUESTION: Can I ask a question on Cuba?
MR PATEL: Sure.
QUESTION: There’s a high-level delegation
that’s going to be visiting Cuba soon, U.S. delegation. Does that indicate that
maybe relations with Cuba is becoming more normalized or we’re on the cusp of
normalized relations with Cuba?
MR PATEL: Are you speaking about the law
enforcement —
QUESTION: Law enforcement, international law
and all that stuff.
MR PATEL: Yeah, sure, sure.
QUESTION: But I’m sure that they will probably
discuss —
MR PATEL: Said, let me – if you’ll let me offer
some broader thoughts. So to – for those that might be tracking, U.S. and Cuban
officials will meet as part of the U.S.-Cuba Law Enforcement Dialogue in Havana
next week to discuss topics of bilateral interest on international law
enforcement matters, increased international law enforcement cooperation, and
this is an opportunity to enable the U.S. to better protect U.S. citizens and
bring transnational criminals to justice.
The Departments of State, Justice, and Homeland Security will co-chair
the dialogue for the United States. And broadly speaking, Said, to your
question, improved law enforcement coordination between the United States and
Cuba is in the best interest in the United States and the Cuban people. And
during the dialogue, the U.S. and Cuba will address topics of bilateral
interest.
*********************
QUESTION: I had a follow-up on the question on Cuba.
MR PATEL: Sure.
QUESTION: So you said that this meeting on law
enforcement issues is in the best interest of the United States. Would you
consider that it would be now in the best interests of the United States to
actually normalize relations with Cuba?
And then second, so there’s this meeting on law enforcement issues,
criminality, transnational, etc., but the United States still has Cuba on the
supporting terrorism list, on its list of supporting – states supporting
terrorism. How do you justify having that meeting in Cuba while the country is
still on your official list of sponsoring terrorism?
MR PATEL: Can you repeat the second part of your question,
Leon? Sorry.
QUESTION: Basically how do you justify having this
kind of meeting on specifically law enforcement issues in general while at the
same time keeping the country on the terrorism list?
MR PATEL: Well, Leon, there continue to be,
obviously, concerns and human rights concerns that exist. But I would say
broadly, to widen the aperture a little bit, Leon, following the large-scale
protests that we saw last summer, President Biden directed the department to
act in two primary areas. The first was to promote accountability for human
rights abuses, for which we have announced previously several rounds of
sanctions targeting those individuals and entities with direct ties to human
rights violations.
Specifically within the context of these – this dialogue, let me see if
I have some more information for you. But as I said, engaging in these talks
underscores our commitment to pursuing constructive discussions with the
Government of Cuba where appropriate to advance U.S. interests.
Our belief is, is that establishing and increasing channels for law
enforcement cooperation to better address transnational threats is not at the
expense of the serious human rights concerns that we continue to have. And
we’ve integrated these human rights concerns and protections into all of our
interactions with the Cuban Government.
QUESTION: Vedant, isn’t the real answer that this
administration does not agree with the previous administration’s determination
to put Cuba back on the SSOT list, and that you’ve been looking for a way to
take them off since —
MR PATEL: I don’t have any —
QUESTION: — coming into office —
MR PATEL: I don’t have any update to offer that —
QUESTION: — and therefore, that a law enforcement
dialogue is not inappropriate, given what you believe is —
MR PATEL: Oh, a law enforcement dialogue is not
inappropriate for a variety of reasons, including the ones that I just
outlined.
department
Press Briefing – January 19, 2023
QUESTION: I have a last one on Cuba. Since
United States is having contact with the Cuban regime, is this administration
thinking in withdraw Cuba from the list of countries supporting terrorism?
MR PATEL: I have no change in policy to
announce. I addressed this a little bit last week; the engagements that you’re
referring to were specifically related to some security dialogues, regional
security dialogues. I don’t have any other updates to offer beyond that.
No comments:
Post a Comment